Sweet Home Admin Wiki

 

Leadership by Design

Page history last edited by Geoffrey Hicks 3 yrs ago

Leadership by Design

 

Information for this page was gleaned from: Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). ''Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd Edition . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

 

Summary of Leadership by Design

WIggins argues that if the goal of school reform is deeper understanding of the teaching and learning process on the part of faculty, then leaders have an obligation to deliberately design experiences that allow for that understanding to occur. Facilitating a deeper understanding of the instructional process starts with developing a critical understanding of the design process - what it takes to ensure understanding and transfer. There are two strands of inquiry for faculty to pursue - understanding "understanding" (the concept of transfer and the principle of big ideas), and understanding "good design" - which is best done "backward from the desired results." Wiggins posits three big ideas for leading by design:

  • A new kind of leadership )”as opposed to more “good management”) is needed which encourages -significant changes are required in how school is run and changes in how teaching & learning are conceived is required to succeed in meeting standards
  • Reform must be based on principles about how learning for understanding works, not just generic processes about change.
  • “Backward Design” is vital in long-term planning

 

Ten Principles of Learning

Wiggins also lists 10 overarching principles of learning that must be considered by leaders:

 

  1. The goal of all learning is fluent and effective transfer - powerful and wise use of knowledge, in a variety of contexts.
  2. Meaning is essential to learning: learning goals must make sense to and inspire learners, and work in school must seem important, interesting and goal-driven.
  3. Successful learning requires active processing by the learner: understanding how to reflect, self-assess, question, and use feedback to self-adjust. These processes can (and should) be taught explicitly & assessed.
  4. The complexity of learning requires helpful scaffolding and feedback: teachers must draw upon a rich repertoire of instructional “moves” carefully matched to learning goals and learner needs.
  5. Learning is most effective when it is personalized, when the prior knowledge, interests, and strengths of (diverse) learners are accommodated.
  6. Success in learning depends upon the right blend of challenge and comfort - knowing that success is attainable, and realizing that persistent effort will pay off.
  7. To learn to high standards, learners need many opportunities to practice in risk-free environments, regular and specific feedback related to progress against standards, and timely opportunities to use the feedback to re-do and improve.
  8. All learning-related work in schools should be judged against standards related to learning goals (for both students and staff) and reflective of how people learn.
  9. As a model learning community a school appropriately requires learning from every member of its community, since continual learning is vital for institutional as well as personal success.
  10. All learners are capable of excellent work, if the right conditions are established.

 

 

Leading by Design Framework

Wiggins points out that the principles apply to everyone - students and staff - as to how they should be treated: as learners. The principles serve as criteria for judging curriculum, instruction, and assessment. The challenge for leaders is to enact policies & structures that ensure that the principles are safeguarded against inevitable bad habits, misunderstanding, backsliding with respect to the principles

 

The Leading by Design framework suggests that leaders embody the following six action-related understandings about reform into their work with faculties:

  • Stay focused on results
  • Always aim for deeper understanding
  • Replace fear with initiative
  • Make the plan transparent
  • Keep clarifying goals & questioning habits
  • Get rid of incoherence

 

 

Stay Focused on Results

Leaders need to ask - What’s the feedback?

  • Collect & use data on student achievement, based on local as well as state & national data
  • Make sure the feedback is on-going, timely, useful, credible
  • Get data about standards-related performance
  • Constant surveys of parents, students, graduates, teachers, employers, etc.

 

Aim for Deeper Understanding

The essential questions are: Do they really get it? How do I know?

  • Apply UbD principles to all levels & people of the system: the goal is understanding, not merely informing people once or twice.
  • Understanding requires organized discovery, via constructivist work: how will your plans accomplish this?
  • How will you assess for deepening understanding?

 

Replace Fear with Initiative

The essential quesitons are: Do they really own in? What are the incentives & disincentives?

  • Drive Our Fear is the cardinal principle of TQM, but most schools are driven by compliance, fear or “ignore them” approach.
  • Get the incentives right so that the best people take creative initiative in the work of school improvement.

 

Make the Plan Transparent

Do they know where we’re headed and why? Can they answer the Question - “What’s MY role in this process?

  • While leaders see the means and ends, staff often do not see the goal, its value, or how the pieces fit together
  • Could staff produce a 1-page visual of how it all fits, and what their particular role is?

 

Keep Clarifying Goals, Questioing Habits

The essential quesitons are: Why are we doing this? Is this the best way to do it?

  • Since school has not been a true results-focused and learning organization, many longstanding habits and rituals are dysfunctional - root them out!
  • The desired results and their implications are NEVER clear enough, whether it is a singe UbD unit or the whole change agenda. Keep revisiting the purposes, the point, the big ideas, so that people do not fixate on a particular approach or head off in inappropriate ways.

 

Get Rid of Incoherence

The essential questions are: Does it align? Do the pieces Fit?

  • Whether it is a unit of study or a plan for system change, the elements of a complex design often do not align. The right hand often does not know what the left hand is doing. Make sure the plan for oversight looks closely at alignment issues (e.g., peer review & a steering committee)

 

 

Leadership by Design Resources

Click the links below to access documents that Sweet Home administrators have used to build understanding around the concepts presented in School Leadership that Works.

Examining the Teaching Life - article by Grant Wiggins:http://sweethomeadminwiki.pbwiki.com/f/WigginsExamingTeachingLifeASCD306.pdf
Leading by Design PPT - Wiggins & McTighe:http://sweethomeadminwiki.pbwiki.com/f/LbDDallas05WigginsMcTighe.pdf

 

 

Key Connecting Ideas - Leadership by Design

Wiggins work connects most closely with that of Michael Fullan and Robert Marzano.


 

Understanding by Design

 

 

Understanding by Design (UbD) is a framework for improving student achievement. Emphasizing the teacher's critical role as a designer of student learning, UbD works within the standards-driven curriculum to help teachers clarify learning goals, devise revealing assessments of student understanding, and craft effective and engaging learning activities.

 

Developed by nationally recognized educators Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe, and published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Understanding by Design is based on the following key ideas:

  • A primary goal of education should be the development and deepening of student understanding.
  • Students reveal their understanding most effectively when they are provided with complex, authentic opportunities to explain, interpret, apply, shift perspective, empathize, and self-assess. When applied to complex tasks, these "six facets" provide a conceptual lens through which teachers can better assess student understanding.
  • Effective curriculum development reflects a three-stage design process called "backward design" that delays the planning of classroom activities until goals have been clarified and assessments designed. This process helps to avoid the twin problems of "textbook coverage" and "activity-oriented" teaching, in which no clear priorities and purposes are apparent.
  • Student and school performance gains are achieved through regular reviews of results (achievement data and student work) followed by targeted adjustments to curriculum and instruction. Teachers become most effective when they seek feedback from students and their peers and use that feedback to adjust approaches to design and teaching.
  • Teachers, schools, and districts benefit by "working smarter" through the collaborative design, sharing, and peer review of units of study.

 

In practice, Understanding by Design offers

  • a three-stage "backward planning" curriculum design process anchored by a unit design template
  • a set of design standards with attendant rubrics
  • and a comprehensive training package to help teachers design, edit, critique, peer- review, share, and improve their lessons and assessments.

 

A graphic of the unit design cycle is listed below:

 

 

UBD Resources

Click the links below to access documents that Sweet Home administrators have used to build understanding around the concepts presented in School Leadership that Works''.

UBD Templates:http://sweethomeadminwiki.pbwiki.com/f/WigginsExamingTeachingLifeASCD306.pdf
Essential Questions:http://sweethomeadminwiki.pbwiki.com/f/LbDDallas05WigginsMcTighe.pdf
Wiggins-Framing Curriculum:http://sweethomeadminwiki.pbwiki.com/f/LbDDallas05WigginsMcTighe.pdf
UBD Program Frameworks:http://sweethomeadminwiki.pbwiki.com/f/LbDDallas05WigginsMcTighe.pdf

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.